See! Whose Bugatti Veyron? Son of Mahathir Kutty

Click here for the story.

Deepak the carpetman, bagman, toyboy & Rosmah

Articles by Raja Petra Kamarudin:

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/27586-the-carpetman-who-is-rosmahs-bagman-and-much-more

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/28471-remember-the-carpetman-cum-bagman-cum-toyboy-story

'Carpetman' linked to Altantuya trial tells all to Harakahdaily

Pricey Soo Kee Ipoh Kuey Teow Soup PJ Sea Park

Big bowl (above): RM6.50

Small bowl: RM5.50

If I'm not mistaken, this bowl of wan tan only comes in 10. Price: RM7.00 per bowl.

So, if you're alone and wish to eat wan tan, you'll have to eat 10 pieces of wan tan.

Apparently, the lady boss said wan tan was expensive.

Jose Mujica personal wealth value of 1987 Volkswagen Beetle.

Jose Mujica: The world's 'poorest' president

By Vladimir Hernandez BBC Mundo, Montevideo

In 2010, his annual personal wealth declaration - mandatory for officials in Uruguay - was $1,800 (£1,100), the value of his 1987 Volkswagen Beetle.

Playboy Bunny Felixia Yeap: Guy who syok sendiri

Read all about Felixia's encounter with a lawyer jerk:

The guy who SYOK SENDIRI.

National University of Singapore on sex blogger Alvin

Singapore university terminates sex blogger’s scholarship

November 13, 2012

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 13 ― The National University of Singapore (NUS) has terminated the scholarship of sex blogger Alvin Tan, the republic’s Straits Times newspaper reported today.

But the Malaysian student was not expelled from NUS.

Instead, he will have to pay full, unsubsidised fees as a foreign student if he wants to complete his final year of law school.

The newspaper said that the punishment meted out to the 24-year-old had been a subject of much speculation since NUS announced last week that it would not be revealing the details of the penalty because disciplinary proceedings were private.

Yesterday, Singapore Education Minister Heng Swee Keat described the behaviour of Tan, who is a scholarship student in the republic, as “reprehensible and unbecoming of a scholar”.

Heng was responding in Singapore’s Parliament to MPs who demanded to know what punishment had been meted out by the National University of Singapore (NUS) to Tan.

Alvin was not expelled from NUS.

NUS had drawn public ire for its refusal to disclose how it is punishing the sex-blogging Malaysian scholar whom it found guilty of damaging its reputation.

Tan, the 24-year-old Asean scholar studying law at NUS, is at the centre of a controversy after he and his girlfriend posted in a joint blog photographs and videos of themselves having sex. He had been hauled up for disciplinary action last month.

Tan, a final-year law student, had apologised to NUS for “bringing disrepute” to the school but has insisted that what he did was done in his “own personal time as a private individual and not an NUS student”.

He also maintained that his action was a “victimless crime” and did not harm anyone.

The NUS student had said explicit photos and videos of himself and his girlfriend, Vivian Lee, going viral were “exciting”, according to Yahoo! Singapore.

On the site “Sumptuous Erotica”, Tan and Lee said they loved posting details of their sex life on the web “for everyone to enjoy” and that they uploaded only self-made content.

The blog has since been taken down.

Tan went to Singapore under an ASEAN scholarship in 2004 and attended Xinmin Secondary School and Raffles Junior College before he went to NUS.

He is based in Kuala Lumpur, where he has an online business. His mother helps to run a family business, while his father works in sales.

The couple also faces the possibility of criminal prosecution and jail time if convicted for exhibiting obscene material after they posted photographs and videos of themselves having sex on their blog.

Malaysian Police Commercial Crimes chief Datuk Syed Ismail Syed Azizan said recently that the authorities were considering taking action against the duo for violation of obscenity laws.

Under Section 292 of the Penal Code, the couple could be prosecuted for exhibiting obscene material.

The punishment under the law is imprisonment for a term of up to three years or a fine

Ferrari Model LEGO ® Collection at Shell Malaysia!

All about the promotion here:
http://www.shell.com.my/home/content/mys/products_services/on_the_road/fuels/lego_ferrari_model_collection_tpkg/ferrari_showroom/about/

Lee Chong Wei, Wong Mew Choo: Wedding photos

;P

For more info, click here:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=162086123937851&set=at.103192283160569.6069.103188539827610.527676378&type=1&theater

Royal Facebook slur: Johor police probe Huff Post?

The Malaysian Insider reports:

Cops probing ‘The Malaysian Insider’ over coverage of royal Facebook slur

 HUFF POST REPORTS:

Family defends Malaysian held over Facebook insult

 

Why Nazri NOT worried? UMNO ABOVE THE LAW

Transcript: Why Nazri is not worried

8:52PM Nov 1, 2012

De facto law minister Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz said that he sees no problem with his son driving businessman Michael Chia's Hummer SUV.

He said that if a certain opposition figure (name withheld due to legal reasons) is not worried about a leaked video purportedly depicting himself having a tryst with a foreign sex worker, then there is no reason why he should be.

Reporters had questioned Mohd Nazri at his office after the allegation on the Hummer was exposed by PKR leaders at the Parliament lobby today.
The full transcript follows:

Nazri: He (Rafizi Ramli) got no locus standi.

Reporters: (Batu MP) Tian Chua and (Ampang MP) Zuraida (Kamaruddin) were there also.
Then bring him to Parliament lah.

We can show the stuff that they (PKR) have done.

I saw. If it is an offence... Ask Tian Chua to ask me... If it is an offence report to the police... If I have done any offence, report me to the MACC.

Basically they just said it is a conflict of interest.

Who asked the questions?

All three of them (Zuraida, Tian Chua and Rafizi).

No, no, in Parliament, who asked the question?

First time was Tian Chua (who raised the issue) in question-and-answer session.

Then who is the minister in-charge of... so, who give me the question?

They are saying if your son has links with Michael Chia, then you should not have stood up and defend them...

No, no, no. I'm the minister. I've got no personal interest. When he asked that question, I didn't even know what question was coming. It was (the) committee-level debate.

There was also (a) written answer if I'm not mistaken.

That (question was answered) under my name, of course, and what conflict of interest do I have? I don't have any conflict of interest.
And I have no control of the MACC. I can't tell the MACC to drop cases. They are independent.
So because I have no power to do that, how can I be bribed? I cannot do something which they want me to do.
And in Parliament, you must understand, answers come from the MACC, not from me. I don't even know that... when they asked about Michael Chia, the answer came from the MACC, I don't even know that Michael Chia was not arrested, but the answer came from the MACC. I don't know anything.

What about the claim that you were talking on behalf of (Hong Kong's) Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), saying that the ICAC has cleared them of the charges?
That's the answer from the MACC. You see, our system, you know what, first of all, I don't even know the questions that were going to be asked because it was not planned, it was committee-level debate.
When I was answering, they stood up and asked me. So I'm the minister, I have to answer. The answer all came from the MACC.

Okay, all things aside, whether or not the car is registered under Michael Chia's name...
I don't know. It is between my son and Michael Chia... Anyway, if my son drives a car of Michael Chia, what has that got to do with me? What has that got to do with me? He is not a kid below 21 years old, he is an adult.

They are saying that Dato Seri Shahrizat has claimed the same thing and now it has caused her...
Yeah, that's what they are trying to do... but what have I done? I don't know.

But the thing is, you see, even though you can say that it is not your fault, nothing to do with you and all that, but when it comes out in media, you know how the public would view this kind of... it doesn't sound nice...
It doesn't bother me a bit. (laughs)

Like Shahrizat's case, she said: “I don't know anything about my husband… ”

That's husband and wife. I don't sleep with my son. I'm not gay (reporters laugh). My son is not my wife, my son is not my lover, I don't sleep with him.
What he does, he doesn't tell me. It is different from husband and wife, okay? Why are you so worried?

Not to say worried; I'm just saying that it does not sound nice in public, then the public... and people will start talking.
Let it be, let it be. You press Wikipedia, 'Nazri Aziz', what come out? All sorts of things. I'm still a minister, my friend, okay? It is not going to hurt me one bit. I'm not affected by gutter politics.

Do you know Michael Chia?

I know him also. You see, there must be this difference, okay. If I'm a High Court judge, and Michael Chia appears before me and my son drives his car, then I'm in trouble.
I'm not a judge in Michael Chia's case. I'm not even the investigator. The MACC is (the investigator) in Michael Chia's case. I'm a minister replying in Parliament.

They claimed that the ICAC has not cleared (Michael Chia), and the ICAC closed the case because they didn't get any cooperation from Malaysia, from the MACC.

No, no, it was a donation... This one, you don't ask me. You must ask the Attorney-General's Chambers, you must ask the MACC.
You know I'm not their spokesperson. I only replied what they gave me. They are independent body, I got no control over the MACC, I got no control over the AG. So how can I be influencing them?
I can't and all those replies in Parliament, you know, are answers given by the MACC, not my personal answers.
You must understand the system. The AG and the chief commissioner of the MACC, they cannot appear in Parliament, they have got no locus standi.

You are the spokesperson?

With their consent. All my answers, anything about the MACC and AG's Chambers, all from them like people who get angry with me (when) I said secular state. That's AG.
People get angry with me because I say Pati (illegal migrants) in Sabah is not a threat. That is security council punya jawab (answer). Kalau PM jawab, PM kena marah. I'm okay, I have no problem. It's part and parcel of my job.

As de facto law minister, although just reading out answer from different agencies, do you see yourself influential because your reply carries weight... ?

I'm a very influential person. I'm a very influential man. There's no doubt about it, very important too.
I'm not scared at all, I did nothing wrong. Those replies came from Parliament. I was merely doing my job, discharging my duties and responsibility.

So you won't consider suing Rafizi then?

What for? Let him be a trumpet blower. Anyway, I don't really want to answer him because he's not an MP.
I think if Tian Chua was there only to let him (Rafizi) make a statement at (the) parliament (lobby), because he's not a member of Parliament, he cannot make a statement here, he's just a wannabe. Make sure you're an MP first, then come to talk to me.

Anyway, even in the Parliament, (during) debates... Ketua Pembangkang (Opposition Leader), that's my level. But of course, MPs ask me, they ask. But this guy, no way.

If one day, he enters Parliament as an MP, he'll bash you.

Suruh dia masuk parliament dulu la. (Tell me him to enter Parliament first). I don't want to stoop low and deal with him, okay?
But since you all come and ask, I just say lah. It's not even a mosquito bite. I'm sorry. If you all come here thinking I'll be upset, far from it.

But do you know about the Hummer?

That's between my son and Michael Chia. I know Michael Chia.

So you confirm Hummer really exists...

Kalau dia nak bagi Hummer ke, Ferrari ke, itu Michael Chia punya pasal lah, bukan bagi dekat I (If he wants to give a Hummer, or a Ferrari, that's Michael Chia's business. He's not giving it to me). I'm the minister, not my son, okay?

So you confirm that the Hummer really exists.

Buat apa nak confirm. Gambar dah ada. You pergi tanya anak I. (Why should I confirm it? The pictures are there. You go ask my son.)
As I've said, I don't sleep with my son, okay? I'm not gay and I'm not incestuous.

Do you see a problem (with the fact) that your son (drives) Michael Chia's car?

Why is it a problem? It's between him and Michael. Go and find Michael lah. Go and find Michael.

Is there a problem?

You can ask him lah if there's a problem. I don't drive the car. Mine is WVJ 6. Everyday I come here, WVJ 6. Wealth, victory and justice. Some people say 'wisdom', I don't want (wisdom).

You prefer wealth to wisdom?

I prefer wealth. That's why I'm rich. I can afford a lot of things but certainly it's not NFC's (National Feedlot Corporation's) money.

I know you don't care about gutter politics and that this is not even a mosquito bite to you. But do you think this issue would harm BN in the election?
Why harm BN? Why BN? What about (an opposition figure's) picture screwing (a) Chinese prostitute and all that? That one don't harm... is what is happening to me worse than that? Huh? Is it worse ah? Is it worse?

If (the opposition figure) is not worried, why should I be worried about this? Your picture all over town, in the cyber world, f***ing this prostitute from China. He's not worried, why should I worry about this. You can quote me on this.

You ask me if I'm worried, on whether it will harm BN. What I'm saying is that this picture of (the opposition figure) screwing this Chinese prostitute going all over the cyberworld, he's not worried. My question is: should I be worried?

(Question inaudible, muffled by other reporters' chatter) The way you answer ...

I don't care. Why are you so worried?

I need to confirm again, you know (of) the Hummer?

No need, the pictures are there. You go ask my son. I cannot be responsible for my son. I don't screw him, I don't sleep with him. He sleeps with his wife, he's got a kid. So whatever he does, I don't know. I know Michael Chia, I'm not worried.

If the allegations really exist?

Go report police lah. Why do you (hold) a PC (press conference)? Right or not? You know anything about me, why you make PC? Publicity seeker lah, cheap publicity. Go report police lah, MACC.

If your son is really guilty...

Guilty of what?

If he really committed...

Committed what? Do you know what you are talking about? Committed what? Kiss a girl?

Conflict of interest?

Conflict of interest? But he is not a minister.

But he is related to you.

He's my son. I have no power over MACC. I have no power on AG's Chambers. How can I? And all those questions, answers, came from MACC. How can I be compromised? I cannot be compromised.

It's not my answer, it's the answer of SPRM. You must understand that. It's not my answer, all these answers are from MACC. If I said Michael Chia was not arrested, that was the answer from MACC, not me. I'm not the investigator, I didn't investigate.
If AG said, if I answer in Parliament that ICAC has already closed the case, that is the answer from AG's Chambers. Not my answer.

I see your point.

So don't worry, I'll still be around.

But you're not going to stand in elections, right?

What has this got to do with ... aiyo ... It's not connected, the question.

That's why when you see me, when someone asks (me a question in Parliament), I stand up and the I look around, because I'm waiting for the answer from the officers. It's not my answer.

Are you concerned that your son and his family are being followed?

I'm a rich man, I'm powerful, good looking. (reporters giggle) Wealthy. So what can I do? My son ask, 'Pa, is it...' I say, 'Look, you are my son.'

Will you lodge a police on your son being followed?

Why should I? It doesn't bother me. I'm popular, I have a film star punya status here you know? Celebrity. Bukan film star local, Hollywood punya (laughs).
No, but there is nothing I can do, (if) they want to follow.

And if Rafizi lodges a report with MACC?

What kind of question it that? He wants to report, he report lah. You know, he's a clarinet player, he told me in his tweet.
In Malay College (Kuala Kangsar), when he (enrolled), I was not around, but those who play the clarinet are jambu, you know. Ni jambu punya style la.

Of Nazri, Nedim, Michael Chia, Hummer WNX 9776

Monster Gift! – Michael Chia Handed Huge Hummer To Son Of ‘Friend’ Nazri Abdul Aziz EXCLUSIVE EXPOSE!

1 Nov 2012

Member of Mohammed Nedim’s protection team and the half million ringgit status symbol, Hummer H2, that has ended up in the hands of the Nazri family, but which is still registered under the name of its purchaser, Michael Chia!

This big black beast of a car is an American Hummer 2 SUV, one of the most expensive vehicles in the world, costing around half a million ringgit on the Malaysian market.

For well over a year one of these models, licence plate WNX9776, has been driven around KL by Mohamad Nedim Nazri, the son of a key Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz.

It is especially used by Mohamed Nedim’s team of body-guards, who follow the youthful playboy around in the various sports cars that he also likes to drive.

Yet the car is registered not under the name of Nedim nor his father Nazri Abdul Aziz, but rather of its original purchaser Michael Chia, the Sabah-based money-runner, whom the top politician has just declared ‘cleared’ of all charges relating to his arrest for transporting RM40million from Hong Kong to Sabah in 2008!

Number WNX9776 plate is clearly seen in this recent photograph of the car parked outside Mohammed Nedim’s residence in the prestigious Damansara Heights district of Kuala Lumpur

Proof who’s owner

Sarawak Report has numerous pictures of the Hummer 2 WNX9776 parked outside Mohammed Nedim’s luxury residence at the Clearwater building in Damansara Heights, Kuala Lumpur.  The youth, who has been in a number of violent scrapes in recent months and keeps a permanent bodyguard, occupies a Penthouse Suite in the building where he has also kept the car for months.

Yet this traffic offence (below), identified by Sarawak Report, is proof of the Hummer’s actual registered owner. Not only has Chia been so kind as to offer Nazri’s son a magnificent car, but he has been receiving his speeding tickets as well!

‘Thanks buddy – you’ll pick up the fine won’t you? I get too many of them’. The Hummer WNX9776 is registered in the name of Chia Tien Foh (Michael Chia) yet it was in the possession of Mohammed Nedim by March 2011

The Hummer is one of the many cars identified among Michael Chia’s assets by the MACC investigation into the Sabah money-laundering case. And yet now we see it prominently in the possession of Nazri’s own son, despite Nazri’s position as the Minister responsible for the MACC.

Since Nazri Aziz is the Minister who is ultimately responsible for the supposedly ‘independent’ MACC, it is easy to conclude why a man like Michael Chia might have been anxious to curry favour with such a Minister and his family after the investigation into his money-laundering began in 2008.

Parked outside Clearwater – Chia’s Hummer is in full time possession of Nazri’s KL based son

However, we ask, what acceptable explanation can there be as to why the Minister (or his son) should accept such a gift from a marked man, who was being investigated by his own government department or encourage any form of friendship with someone under such a serious and high profile corruption investigation?

Penthouse luxury at Clearwater – This is Mohd Nedim’s pleasant accommodation, but the query is where does all this money come from for the family of the man in political charge of the MACC?

Failure to declare a personal interest

Trouble – Mohammed Nedim has been caught up in brutal fights, including one death.

Our extraordinary revelation follows an admission two days ago by Nazri that he was indeed a ‘friend’ of Chia, after rumours first surfaced that his son had been given cars by the money-laundering suspect.

The development is likely to have an explosive impact on an already charged political situation, following Nazri’s own announcements on the sudden decision to drop a long running investigation into Michael Chia’s involvement in laundering timber kickbacks, which have beenclearly linked to Sabah Chief Minister, Musa Aman.

Observers are surely going to ask why Nazri did not declare his interest at the time he made his first controversial announcement on October 10th declaring after four years of looking into the case that Chia was after all innocent of any wrong-doing, because the RM40million he was smuggling was intended for UMNO and not Musa Aman personally!

The Minister has attempted to brush off the matter by admitting that Chia is a friend, but not that he knew the man was giving his son cars.  So how DOES Nazri account for his feckless son’s multi-million dollar car collection?  By what means did he imagine rowdy Mohd Nedim, best known for beating people up who annoy him, had acquired these cars?

Ever changing stories and ever weakening answers

Nazri has been Chia’s Chief protector with a series of announcements over the past month declaring him to be innocent and that the MACC investigation is ‘closed’. His latest version of the story is that Chia was never arrested in the first place.

This is an affair that has left BN/UMNO politicians exposed to the accusation that they cannot keep to the same story for more than a few days at a time.

The public has been treated to a series of unconvincing and inconsistent responses every time new evidence presents itself in the Sabah case and doubtless stories will change again now Nazri’s own close friendship and involvement with the main player, Michael Chia, has been exposed.

Originally, after Chia’s arrest and an investigation by Hong Kong’s ICAC and the MACC in 2008, BN tried outright denial.

Attorney General Gani Patail (a relative of Musa)  refused inter-country cooperation to the ICAC, thereby causing the Hong Kong investigation to lapse when the 3 year time limit ran out in 2011. And he also refused to prosecute the MACC’s 40 recommended charges.

At the same time Chia denied he had been arrested, or that there had been RM40million involved or that he had any business or political dealings with Musa.  Musa likewise denied any association with Chia.

Mohd Nedim’s team of driver and bodyguards around the Hummer as they arrive back at the Clearwater apartment

However, this year our series of exposes based on a large body of evidence available to the MACC, have showed that an international web of Chia-controlled accounts were channelling tens of millions of ringgit into Musa Aman’s own personal Zurich bank account, run by the Swiss bank UBS.

We also demonstrated that the same Chia-controlled accounts were being used to provide regular payments to Musa Aman’s sons, while they were studying in Australia.  This was corroborated by the Swiss bank UBS in a separate court case currently in the High Court of Singapore.

These revelations were followed by an announcement by the Swiss Federal Attorney General that it has launched a criminal money-laundering investigation into UBS over its part in the affair.

It appears these developments put so much pressure on BN that the stories started to change. In June, the Prime Minister Najib Razak acknowledged that the MACC had indeed handed a report on the matter to the Attorney General and that Musa was implicated.  For weeks Musa was stranded.

However, suddenly in the middle of last month Nazri Aziz led a fight back with a string of extraordinary announcements. On the one hand BN admitted that Chia had been caught transferring RM40million to Musa, but on the other they declared that Chia and his accomplices had nevertheless been ‘cleared’.

Macho machine – the ultimate boy toy that won Nazri’s valuable support for Michael Chia?

In a parliamentary answer on 10th October Nazri said that both parties had been exonerated on the basis that the money was not for ‘personal use’, but for UMNO use instead!

Onlookers were left amazed that a political donation based on timber kickbacks should be considered any less corrupt than a personal one.  They were also left wondering where this left all the four years of different denials by Musa and Chia.  And if there was nothing wrong with this ‘political donation’, why had it been denied for so long?

Chia – party boy turned multi-millionaire. How did this illiterate young man do it?

But Nazri and his colleagues did not stop here. Soon they developed the story further, claiming that the ICAC investigation had also ‘cleared Musa and Chia’, when in fact the Hong Kong investigation just lapsed owing to non-cooperation from the Malaysian Attorney General.

Since the ICAC has refused to comment, Nazri and his colleagues have not been able to get any evidence to confirm their claim that Chia was found blameless in Hong Kong.

Finally, having admitted the RM40million was being secreted to Sabah, that Chia was ‘detained’ and that the money was frozen and investigated, Nazri’s latest twist has been to claim that Chia was never arrested after all!

So why the 4 years of investigations?

Yet more explanations are now needed

It would appear that a half million ringgit Hummer 2 can buy an awful lot of support in high places.  The roadster has been considered the ultimate ‘macho machine’ ever since Hollywood idols like Arnold Schwarzeneggar started driving the former military vehicles back in the 1990s.

Clearly, young Mohd Nedim was desperately tempted and also aware of the value of this status symbol.

However, accepting such a gift opens his father to unstoppable questions about what other incentives might have been employed to encourage so many energetic public defences of Chia by Nazri over the past few days?  After all there have also been reports of millions of ringgit changing hands and Nazri has certainly been working exceedingly hard on Chia’s behalf!

Mr Nazri certainly has some explaining to do and we should prepare ourselves for many more stories and denials.

Mohammed Nedim’s personnel leave the Hummer and head for the Clearwater building. Chia’s car is now at their disposal.

Share this:

•