Former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad today backed his son Mukhriz's allegation that the Bar Council had lobbied for the appointment of judges during the former’s tenure..."Yes, there was lobbying, there were people (from the Bar Council) that lobbied (for the appointment of judges) but whether or not I appointed them is a different story. "There were people who talked (so the lobbying did take place) but indirectly-lah" he told reporters at a press conference held after attending an event in Kuala Lumpur....On another matter, Mahathir welcomed the government's decision to defer the proposed sale of the National Heart Institute to Sime Darby. He said it was a good decision as the specialist hospital "holds a special place in the hearts of the public." In another development, Mahathir reiterated that he does not have enough evidence to name the Umno members involved in money politics. (Dr M: Yes, they lobbied for judicial appointments - Mkini)
Indirectly, on the alleged lobbying, Mahathir also does not have enough evidence. So, why talk about it? Ultimately, he still had the discretionary power to appoint even if the lobbying did happen.
Indirectly, on the alleged lobbying, Mahathir also does not have enough evidence. So, why talk about it? Ultimately, he still had the discretionary power to appoint even if the lobbying did happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment