MK reported that the organiser of the protest denied that the act of spitting and stepping on the head of the cow was meant to belittle the Hindu religion or to stoke religious tension.
I remember the organiser also mentioned that the 'cow-head' demo was not part of the planned protest and it came out of nowhere.
If that is true, then why is he defending the 'cow-head' act by denying that it was not meant to belittle the Hindus.
His statements are certainly contradictory.
I remember the organiser also mentioned that the 'cow-head' demo was not part of the planned protest and it came out of nowhere.
If that is true, then why is he defending the 'cow-head' act by denying that it was not meant to belittle the Hindus.
His statements are certainly contradictory.
No comments:
Post a Comment