Nizar argued that the picking of judges to be part of a panel in a hearing is a “quasi judicial” action, which has to be disposed of with fairness, impartiality and justice, and backed with strong credible judgment.
He said he believes a full quorum of 11 judges is needed and there is no credible reasons why his application should be rejected.
According to the ousted MB, the apex court had in 2005 in the criminal appeal of Public Prosecutor vs Tan Tatt Eek had decided to have a seven-member panel to decide on the issue “whether presumption of possession may be used to invoke the presumption of trafficking”.
(Source: Mkini - Support Mkini - Subscribe to Mkini!)
YB Nizar, the federal court may not rule in your favour. If so, no worries. The rakyat will ensure that justice will be served in the next election.
He said he believes a full quorum of 11 judges is needed and there is no credible reasons why his application should be rejected.
According to the ousted MB, the apex court had in 2005 in the criminal appeal of Public Prosecutor vs Tan Tatt Eek had decided to have a seven-member panel to decide on the issue “whether presumption of possession may be used to invoke the presumption of trafficking”.
(Source: Mkini - Support Mkini - Subscribe to Mkini!)
YB Nizar, the federal court may not rule in your favour. If so, no worries. The rakyat will ensure that justice will be served in the next election.
No comments:
Post a Comment